Defining the Agile Organization by Arlen Bankston
Defining The Agile Organization
Agile methods have been around since approximately the early 80’s; from RAD and JAD, to Spiral Development, Scrum and Extreme Programming. However, these methods have historically focused on improving the performance of teams within development groups, while largely ignoring the broader environments in which these teams must exist – the “agile organization”.
To this end, I have written a draft, based upon the Agile Software Development Manifesto, which defined the facets of methods which called themselves “agile”. The “Manifesto for Organizational Agility” lays out the following principles, divided into three core areas:
Organizational Design & Leadership
- Self Management over Hierarchy – Self-managing groups allow for more localized decision making, which is faster, more motivating, and more scalable when done properly. Keep hierarchies as flat as possible, but support meaningful commitments through clear localized decision-making policies, dynamic role allocation, and pull systems with visible rules.
- Wholeness over Work Focus Alone – Support employees’ well being, motivation, growth and value orientation through organic, human work environments, flexible hours, workspaces, tools, approaches, and connection to a resonating purpose.
- Evolutionary Purpose over Static Missions – Agile organizations should be ready to deal with rapidly changing competitive environments and customer needs. Let missions and roles evolve organically, from within, and based upon demand, by encouraging experimentation and enhancing feedback loops.
- Experiments over Business Cases – To save money and improve creative focus, prototype and test ideas before funding them by applying agile portfolio management, and using techniques like the lean startup, UX approaches, and hackathons. Make this all operationally possible through devops-style integrated, flexible capabilities.
- Product & Service Flow over Transient Projects – To allow for faster starts and more knowledgeable and dynamic working groups, establish stable teams and feed them dynamic flows of work via versatile, standing teams, agile portfolio management and enablement of continuous delivery/deployment capabilities.
- Iteration by Observation over Iteration by Opinion – Get feedback through real-life usage and empirical data, not just internal demos via continuous delivery, lean startup-style techniques and lean UX.
- Holistic Product Teams over Unilateral Product Owners – To drive better innovation and lessen handoffs, use the whole team to drive product design, with facilitative rather than dictatorial leaders, design thinking, collaborative design patterns, story mapping.
These are my thoughts, based on seventeen years of experience across industries, but organizations are complex entities, and there are other facets to consider. Those of you who have undertaken this journey may have other thoughts, and I’d love to hear them.
See more about the Future of Agility here: